Monday, June 25, 2007
Save America's Wolves
With just 59 remaining in the wild, America’s southwest wolves (sometimes called “lobos”) are in big trouble. Now some anti-wolf extremists want Congress to abandon efforts to save them.
Email your Representative right now and urge him or her to oppose efforts to eliminate funding for the southwest wolf recovery program. A vote on the issue is expected tomorrow, so please take action now!
Myth: “Nothing is more attractive to a wolf than the sound of a crying baby.” Representative Steve Pearce (NM)
Fact: There is not one documented case of a healthy, wild wolf killing a human in the United States. In fact, you are more likely to be killed by a meteorite than a wild wolf.
Help stop the lies. Take action now to save wolves.
Can you imagine the southwest without wolves? You might have to if Representative Steve Pearce (NM) is successful in his bid tomorrow to end the federal recovery program for southwest wolves.
Urge your U.S. Representative to oppose efforts to end the southwest wolf recovery program. Congress is expected to vote on the future of southwest wolves tomorrow, so please take action now.
In one of the great conservation accomplishments of the 20th century, the “lobo” was reintroduced to New Mexico and Arizona in 1998 after being driven to extinction in the wild during the early part of the last century.
These captive-bred wolves and their wild offspring have done well -- forming packs, hunting elk, pairing up and having pups. Left alone, these wolves thrive. Unfortunately, they’ve struggled against local opposition, illegal killing and mismanagement.
Just 59 southwest wolves now remain, and some in Congress want to end federal efforts to save them.
An amendment expected to be offered tomorrow by Representative Steve Pearce (NM) would eliminate funding for the southwest wolf reintroduction program -- completely ending the program and dooming the wolves to extinction.
In preparation for the vote, Pearce and his anti-wolf allies have even stooped to spreading misinformation about the southwest wolf recovery program, circulating factually inaccurate reports of wolf attacks. At a recent hearing on the Endangered Species Act, Pearce even made the outrageous statement that “Nothing is more attractive to a wolf than the sound of a crying baby.”
For the record, there is not one documented case of a healthy, wild wolf killing a human in the United States. In fact, you are more likely to be killed by a meteorite than a wild wolf.
Southwest wolves can’t write Congress, but you can.
Help us counter the lies. Take action right now to save Southwest wolves.
I hope you’ll take just a few moments right now to help save this beautiful symbol of the American Southwest.
Sincerely,
Rodger Schlickeisen
President
Defenders of Wildlife Rodger Schlickeisen, President (c)Daniel J. Cox/www.naturalexpos
P.S. A vote is expected on this issue in next few hours. Please take action now!
Defenders Home | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Donate Now
© Copyright 2007, Defenders of Wildlife
Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities.
Defenders of Wildlife can be contacted at:
1130 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Friday, June 22, 2007
Imagine If...
Imagine if You could then use Your mind to manifest these decisions - without wavering - because it's crystal clear where you need to be and what you need to do.
Imagine if You could Create this Life of Your Dreams.
Imagine thousands of lives benefiting from your new creation - whether it's a book, a work of art, or a business.
Imagine creating jobs, changing lives, creating products that benefit humanity.
Imagine being a shining light - a bringer of wisdom and enlightenment to your community.
Follow this link to get started.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Want to make money online?
Friday, June 15, 2007
Bird numbers plummeting | Chicago Tribune
Bird numbers plummeting
Audubon study finds 'disturbing' decline in IllinoisBy John Biemer
Tribune staff reporter
Published June 15, 2007
Populations of several Illinois birds nose-dived over the last 40 years -- particularly grassland species once abundant in "The Prairie State" -- as their habitat was lost to development and the conversion of family farms into industrialized agriculture, according to an analysis released Thursday by the National Audubon Society.
The Illinois trends, which Audubon called "disturbing," matched those of many birds nationally. But "in some cases it's far worse" and should serve as a wake-up call, according to Justin Pepper, deputy director of Audubon-Chicago Region.
"These are the birds of our back yards and nearby forest preserves and they're in trouble," said Judy Pollock, director of bird conservation for Audubon-Chicago Region.
The analysis was the first of its kind for the environmental non-profit. The group pulled together 40 years of bird population data collected by thousands of volunteer "citizen scientists" in its annual Christmas bird count and combined it with breeding bird survey data from the U.S. Geological Survey.
The goal was not to identify the nation's most endangered birds, but common ones with the most rapidly declining populations.
They highlighted the impact of disappearing and deteriorating habitat as opposed to more recent blights on bird populations, such as West Nile virus, which has taken a sizable toll on certain species such as crows and blue jays.
The findings tell a story bigger than a few bird species because they serve as indicators of the health of entire ecosystems, said Chicago region Audubon Director Stephen Packard.
"These birds are just the tip of a melting iceberg," he said.
Declining populations among Illinois' grassland and shrub-land bird species are well-known in the scientific community and "very, very serious," according to Jeff Walk, a conservation scientist for the Nature Conservancy. But the analysis is useful "in terms of putting together a complete picture over a 40-year time interval and looking at both the nesting season and the wintering season," he said.
Audubon made note of some conservation projects in the Chicago region that have succeeded in reversing the trend -- at least in localized pockets such as Spring Creek Valley Forest Preserve in northwest Cook County, which is a series of former farming and grazing pastures that Pepper identified as becoming a "rare gem" for birds.
Alan Anderson, vice president of the Chicago Audubon Society, had monitored the site for 22 years and gradually watched species slip away. But Audubon volunteers in recent years have helped pull out buckthorn and other invasive shrubs and weeds, removed litter and seeded fields with native prairie grass.
In one area of the park, known as Galloping Prairie, bobolinks increased almost tenfold and meadowlarks increased fivefold since 2004.
"Last year was the most fantastic, because there were species I hadn't seen there in a number of years, and large numbers of them too," said Anderson, citing dickcissel and grasshopper sparrows as a couple of species that reappeared as the land was rehabilitated.
"It's a hopeful sign because it says we know what to do and, on this small scale, we're seeing results," said Pepper. "It's just as simple as providing the habitat they need."
Still, some Illinois birds will never climb back to previous levels.
The state has lost more than 99 percent of its original prairie and 90 percent of its original wetland acreage to development and agriculture.
Of the top 20 declining birds identified by the society nationwide, a dozen were found in Illinois -- including the horned lark, the northern bobwhite, the field sparrow, the whip-poor-will, the common tern and the little blue heron.
The analysis found some species that have increased their populations in Illinois over the last four decades -- including wild turkeys, Canada geese, turkey vultures, great blue herons and red-tailed hawks.
Many raptors, including Cooper's hawks and even bald eagles, have rebounded after bans on detrimental chemicals and a cultural shift away from shooting hawks and owls, which once were perceived as nuisances.
"The vast majority of them have increased significantly over 40 years," Walk said. "These birds are doing very, very well now."
----------
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Help rebuild the Everglades
If you can not read this message for any reason, you can view it online now...
|
| © Copyright 2007, Defenders of Wildlife This message was sent to dottye789@earthlink.net. Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Defenders of Wildlife can be contacted at: |
Act Now to Stop Trophy Hunting of Polar Bears
A few weeks ago, I wrote to you about the growing list of threats facing polar bears. We've seen the heartbreaking images of polar bears struggling to survive as their habitat shrinks due to global climate change. But the bears also face additional pressures from trophy hunting, a practice that inflicts needless cruelty on this already imperiled species. Since 1994, more than 800 polar bears have been shot, stuffed, mounted, and imported into the United States by trophy hunters. You can help protect polar bears from cruel trophy hunts.
The Polar Bear Protection Act (H.R. 2327/S. 1406) seeks to close a loophole in the Marine Mammal Protection Act to help protect these majestic creatures from trophy hunting. Congress has the opportunity to shut the door on the importation of sport-hunted polar bears -- your elected officials need to hear from you today.
TAKE ACTION
Please make a brief, polite phone call to your U.S. Representative and each of your two U.S. Senators and urge them to co-sponsor the Polar Bear Protection Act.
| Representative Tim Mahoney (202) 225-5792 | Senator Mel Martinez (202) 224-3041 |
| Senator Bill Nelson (202) 224-5274 |
Making a phone call is easy and an effective way to communicate your views. A staff member will take your message and pass it to your legislator. When you call, you can say:
"My name is [your name] and I'm calling from [your city and state] to urge [your legislator's name] to co-sponsor the Polar Bear Protection Act (H.R. 2327/S. 1406). It's critical that we protect the declining populations of polar bears from trophy hunting, especially when they're already struggling with the effects of global warming. Thank you."
After you make your calls, send a follow-up email to your members of Congress and urge your friends and family to get involved.
Thank you for taking action to protect polar bears at this critical time, and for all you do on behalf of animals.
Sincerely,
Mike Markarian
Executive Vice President
The Humane Society of the United States
Saturday, June 9, 2007
Gore goes green at home | Herald Sun
AL GORE, stung by criticism over his house's energy efficiency, says renovations are almost complete to make it a model "green" home.
"This plan has been in the works for a long time," the environmental activist and former vice-president said.
"The only thing that has changed is that we're more public about it because of the misleading attack by a global-warming denier group."
This year a conservative group criticised Mr Gore, citing electricity bills that were far more than the typical Nashville home. Records showed the Gore family paid an average monthly electricity bill of about $1400.
Mr Gore's renovation project, which he said has been in the works for months, seeks to meet standards established by the US Green Building Council.
Once his upscale neighbourhood changed zoning laws this year, Mr Gore was able to place solar panels on his roof and is preparing to install a geothermal system that will, among other things, drastically reduce the cost of heating his pool.
Drew Johnson, whose Tennessee Centre for Policy Research had criticised Mr Gore, said: "The renovations are obviously in direct response to our finding that he's a hypocrite on the issue of global warming."
- AP
Friday, June 8, 2007
Healthy Hands for Gardening
Gloves protect your hands from blisters, thorns and cuts while doing rough work like digging or pruning in the garden. Investing in one or more pairs of quality gloves is a good decision.
Here are some tips on how to choose the pair that will suit you best:
1. Look for quality leather gloves with a cloth back; this will let the gloves breathe and keep your hands dry, cool and comfortable.
2. If mud bothers you, select rubber gloves with cotton lining.
3. When spraying pesticides or chemicals choose gloves that are made from neoprene. Gloves made from latex or any type of plastic may not offer the best protection.
4. When pruning roses, use gloves that reach up to the arms.
Find out more at Easy Gardening
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Lawmakers Oppose House Energy Plan - Forbes.com
Opposition mounted among House Democrats on Thursday to an energy proposal that would block California and 11 states from regulating tailpipe emissions.
At a hearing on a comprehensive bill that would increase mileage standards for vehicles and promote alternative sources of energy, a number of Democrats said they would try to defeat the emissions plan. It would limit state efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate them.
That idea "is cutting the legs out from under the states just as they are starting to sprint forward on carbon pollution regulation," said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., already has announced her opposition.
Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., said she would propose removing the emissions plan from the overall bill next week. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., released a letter signed by a dozen Democrats opposed to the proposal from Rep. Rick Boucher, who heads a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee.
The subcommittee hearing dealt with the wide-ranging energy legislation that would require the auto industry to meet gas mileage standards of at least 36 miles per gallon for passenger cars after 2021 and 30 mpg for trucks after 2024.
Monday, June 4, 2007
Say NO to liquid coal
Dear Dottye,
| Liquid coal will NOT move America toward a clean energy future. Better, cleaner options exist: efficiency, smart growth and renewable fuels. |
Have you heard about liquid coal? It's a transportation fuel made from coal that is expensive, inefficient, dirty, and releases large quantities of heat-trapping carbon dioxide into our air.
Despite these drawbacks, however, Congress is getting ready to throw huge subsidies at the liquid coal industry instead of investing those taxpayer dollars in efficient, renewable energy that will help solve global warming and decrease our dependence on oil.
Help us tell Congress that liquid coal is the wrong way to go!
Click here to urge your members of Congress to oppose liquid coal fuels!
The considerable economic, social and environmental drawbacks of coal-derived liquid fuel rule it out as a sound option to help move America beyond oil. Relying on liquid coal as an alternative to oil could nearly double global warming pollution per gallon of transportation fuels!
For example, using coal-based transportation fuel in a Honda Civic would mean doubling the CO2 emissions, which would be equivalent to operating a Hummer H3 run on conventional gasoline.*
Moreover, large-scale use of liquid coal would exacerbate the devastating effects of coal mining felt by communities and ecosystems stretching from Appalachia to the Rocky Mountains, including polluted air and water, devastated landscapes and a dismal record of worker safety.
There are better, cleaner, quicker, and cheaper ways to reduce our oil use - it's time for Congress to put us on a path to a clean and secure energy future.
Click here to send your letter to Congress today urging them to oppose liquid coal!
Once you've written your letter, please forward this message to your friends and family and ask them to join you in urging Congress to say NO to liquid coal.
Thank you for your help on this important issue.
Sincerely,
Julie Waterman
SaveOurEnvironment.org